Adelaide, Nov 10, 2022:
India loses yet another ICC World Cup Semifinal, perhaps in the most disturbing way possible. 20 overs, defending a seemingly par 168, India failed to contain runs and failed to take wickets. Is this what we all waited for, for so long? The amount of cricket India’s played over the last 1-2 years building up to the T20 World Cup might find themselves questioning its worth. To lose a game is one thing, to keep losing crucial games is the other, but to not even pick up a single wicket and consistently concede over 10 runs an over is criminal. The fact that it came in an ICC semi-final made it an even grave offense.
2013, is when India won its last ICC Trophy – going unbeaten throughout the tournament and not once not being convincing. All the subsequent tournaments – T20 World Cup 2014, ODI World Cup 2015, T20 World Cup 2016, Champions Trophy 2017, ODI World Cup 2019, World Test Championship Final 2021, T20 World Cup 2021, and now, T20 World Cup 2022 – India’s managed to bottleneck in critical situations every single time. They’ve reached 3 Finals and 4 Semi-Finals in the said 8 tourneys, each ending in a debacle – every time the approach was called into question, avoidable mistakes took to blame and the underlying misery was brought to the surface. Talk about mentality and it only seems to have gotten stronger, criticize the skills and they continue to blow our mind away, upcoming talent? Does not cease to exist (and surprise), and yet, India’s found ways to ‘choke’ in important situations. The Indians have been caught lacking the approach, the intent, the definition of their own roles in the team, and at times even the cricketing sense (Shami’s overthrow being the latest example) far too often in these knockouts. Bilateral series have staged some clinical performances, but the phrase “45 mins of poor cricket” has emerged as THE haunted lane for Indian cricket at ICC tournaments.
Life’s much more at ease if there were specific causes to address; there have been none. Building up to this World Cup, just like any other ICC tournament in these last few years, India’s had some memorable performances that have shaped up well with all the right combinations, and winning mindsets and have gone on to win almost every T20I series that they featured in. The Indian Premier League (IPL) – considered to be a gold mine for new talent also delivered its bit with players like Suryakumar Yadav, Arshdeep Singh, Harshal Patel, and Deepak Hooda amongst others coming to the fore and doing the job for the team more often than not. The likes of Dinesh Karthik, Yuzvendra Chahal, and Ravi Ashwin found their way back into the Indian side on the backs of staggering individual performances. It would be a fair argument to talk about the exclusion of a Sanju Samson, Ishan Kishan, or a Shreyas Iyer, but even that emerges to be only an equal bargain. India has also done exceedingly well in Tests during the team winning the unconquered frontiers, multiple times. Where does it all go wrong then?
Maybe the sheer amount of cricket played in a calendar year takes a toll. Virat Kohli in his recent return from a month-long break from sport talked about how the time away helped him regain perspective and confidence. It’s often about how the player feels about themselves and their game and is important to give them the time to relax and recuperate. The current schedule might not allow the Indian players that. The elongation of IPL into a 3-month long cricket festival is slated to strain the workload even further – which leads me to think if the debate about IPL not being healthy for international cricket actually stands ground. Yes, IPL is served as a breeding ground for Indian youngsters, but at the same time has often injured players – thereby affecting their national team availability. The likes of Jasprit Bumrah, Rohit Sharma, Shreyas Iyer, and Suryakumar Yadav amongst others have all suffered from these IPL-related injuries at crucial points in their careers. Moreover, India’s “monopoly” when it comes to IPL, has seen it prevent 1. Indian players to play in foreign T20 Leagues and 2. (as per reports) find itself a 3-month window without any international cricket being played. While the brand, money, and eyeballs the league connects could perhaps justify both scenarios, it is imperative to understand that a domestic league would never find itself above International cricket.
The involved financials, generated revenue streams, and the gathered power from the league is inarguably BCCIs biggest gain, but a structure more conducive to international cricket is truly, the need of the hour. Look at fellow other countries like England, and Australia and they possess their own domestic leagues that often run in parallel with even their own international games. The kind of response garnered by both cricket boards still remains comparable to their international cricket-watching audiences. And that makes me wonder if India should take down the same path as well.
Perhaps, let the players decide what leagues they want to be a part of, let the international schedule be widespread, inclusive and yet a lot reduced, and let IPL be run as another side hustle rather than a mainstay. After all, prioritizing one breed of cricket for another looks like the only way forward.
All said India are down and out of the World Cup. A million theories will seek postulation but the only one that matters is the one for the captain, team, and team management. A Home ODI World Cup is just about around the corner in 2023 and I only hope India have their eyes set. Just like we had a Wankhede 2011, I believe we do have a Motera 2023 in us. “And then 10 years later…..” would then be a happy story to tell.